Digital Occupational Safety the Legal Responsibility of App-Based Companies Regarding the Occupational Health and Safety of Online Transport Drivers

Authors

  • Dewi Tjandraningsih Sheikh Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Digital Occupational Safety, App-Based Companies, Legal Responsibility, Occupational Health and Safety

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the gig economy has reshaped conventional labor relationships, particularly within the online transportation sector, where drivers face distinct physical and psychological occupational hazards. Despite these risks, app-based companies frequently classify drivers as independent "partners" rather than formal employees, creating a legal ambiguity regarding corporate obligations toward Occupational Health and Safety (OHS). This study examines the legal responsibility of app-based companies in guaranteeing OHS protections for online transport drivers under current labor law frameworks. Employing a normative legal research methodology with statutory and conceptual approaches, this paper analyzes statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and partnership agreements governing digital platform work. The findings indicate that existing labor laws inadequately safeguard gig workers due to rigid traditional definitions of employment relationships based on subjection and wages. Consequently, platform companies effectively transfer operational risks onto drivers while evading mandatory OHS duties. This paper concludes that legal reform is imperative to reconstruct the legal framework of work relationships and establish statutory OHS liability for platform companies to ensure comprehensive protection for digital transport workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2023). Essential platform work: Digital labor and occupational health and safety in the post-pandemic era. International Labour Review, 162(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12380

Asrori, M., Hidayat, N., & Prasetyo, A. (2025). Algorithmic control and structural vulnerability of ride-hailing workers: A critical labor law perspective. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 12(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2024.18

Bowdler, M., & Rogers, L. (2025). Algorithmic management and psychosocial risks at work: An emerging occupational safety and health challenge. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 51(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4120

Christine, L., & Wijaya, H. (2025). Disguised employment relationship towards platform-based drivers: Tensions between partnership agreements and statutory labor guarantees. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(2), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no2.4833

Countouris, N., & De Stefano, V. (2024). Regulating platform work in Europe: Statutory presumptions, algorithmic management, and occupational health. Industrial Law Journal, 53(1), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwad022

De Groen, W. P., & Kilhoffer, Z. (2023). Occupational safety, health standards, and platform work: Legal liability and preventive policies in the gig transport sector. Safety Science, 158, Article 105980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105980

Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2023). Algorithmic management and worker safety: Implications of automated dispatch and rating systems on platform driver wellbeing. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(4), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12510

European Union. (2024). Directive (EU) 2024/2831 of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work. Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/2831.

Felix, R., Alpert, K., & Smith, M. (2023). Autonomy or algorithmic subordination? Assessing the legal boundaries of app-based transportation partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(3), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05240-8

Glavin, P., & Schieman, S. (2024). Digital platform work, occupational fatigue, and psychological distress: The mediating role of algorithmic surveillance. Work, Employment and Society, 38(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231182012

Hermawati, S., & Pratama, I. (2025). Occupational safety risks and fatigue management in Indonesian ride-hailing and delivery sectors. Ergonomics, 68(4), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2593481

Hynes, C., & O'Brien, P. (2024). Liability without boundaries: Re-evaluating corporate duty of care in algorithmically driven transport networks. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, Article 105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105912

International Labour Organization. (2024). Realizing decent work in the platform economy: Law and practice update (Report V(1), International Labour Conference, 113th Session). ILO Publications.

International Labour Organization. (2026). International labour standard on decent work in the platform economy (ILO Convention No. 193). ILO Publications.

Jaydarifard, A., Rahman, M., & Leso, V. (2024). Sociotechnical hazards and traffic safety risks among app-based gig drivers: A systemic OHS assessment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 195, Article 107410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107410

Kenner, J., & Johnston, H. (2023). Protecting gig economy workers: From statutory ambiguity to legal duty of care in platform logistics. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 44(2), 289–318.

Leso, V., Vetrani, I., & Iavicoli, I. (2024). The impact of algorithmic management on occupational health and safety in digital platform work: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(5), Article 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21050582

Ministry of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Law No. 6 of 2023 on the enactment of government regulation in lieu of Law No. 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into Law. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Palilingan, R. A., & Sutedi, A. (2026). Psychosocial hazards and occupational safety in location-based platform work: A qualitative legal and empirical inquiry. Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 14(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.5281/josh.2026.869

Qashqaie, F., Taylor, S., & Wood, A. J. (2025). Digital reputation systems and worker exposure: How rating algorithms undermine workplace safety standards. New Technology, Work and Employment, 40(1), 102–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12290

Samsudin, M., Rahayu, S., & Kusuma, D. (2024). Reconsidering partnership doctrines under Indonesian labor law: Statutory obligations for online transport platforms. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 11(3), 310–335.

Smit, L., & Stopforth, G. (2023). Corporate human rights due diligence and platform work: Enforcing safety accountability across app-based transport supply chains. Business and Human Rights Journal, 8(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2023.12

Todolí-Signes, A. (2024). Algorithmic management and safety at work: Mandatory health assessments and automated duty-of-care obligations. European Labour Law Journal, 15(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231215401

Wood, A. J., Lehdonvirta, V., & Graham, M. (2023). Algorithmic control and worker health in the gig economy: A multi-jurisdictional legal and sociological perspective. Work and Occupations, 50(3), 345–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231159012

Zekic, N., & Veen, A. (2025). Vicarious liability and duty of care in algorithmic employment ecosystems: Bridging the gap for ride-hailing drivers. Social & Legal Studies, 34(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639241289050

Downloads

Published

2026-11-02

How to Cite

Dewi Tjandraningsih. (2026). Digital Occupational Safety the Legal Responsibility of App-Based Companies Regarding the Occupational Health and Safety of Online Transport Drivers. The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration, 4(5), 220–228. Retrieved from https://www.ijems.id/index.php/ijlrsa/article/view/406