The Relevance of the Miranda Rule for the Protection of Human Rights in Law Enforcement in Indonesia

Authors

  • Suhardi Somomoeljono Matla'ul Anwar University, Banten, Indonesia
  • Maryzka Tiara Hardy Matla'ul Anwar University, Banten, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i4.235

Keywords:

Miranda Rule, Human Rights, Law Enforcement, Indonesia

Abstract

This study explores the relevance of the Miranda Rule in protecting human rights within the context of law enforcement in Indonesia. The Miranda Rule, originating from the United States legal system, mandates that individuals taken into custody must be informed of their constitutional rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to legal counsel. Although Indonesia does not formally adopt the Miranda Rule, similar principles are embedded in its legal framework through the constitution and criminal procedure law. This research highlights the gaps in implementation and enforcement that often lead to human rights violations during arrest and interrogation processes. Using a normative legal approach and supported by case analysis, this paper argues that the integration of Miranda-like safeguards in Indonesian law enforcement practices can significantly strengthen the protection of suspects' rights and uphold due process. The study concludes that adopting procedural guarantees akin to the Miranda Rule is not only relevant but essential to aligning Indonesia's legal system with international human rights standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Indonesian law. Oxford University Press.

Duff, A. (2012). On dealing with Euroscepticism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02304.x

Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking rights seriously: With a new appendix, a response to critics. Harvard University Press.

Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280

Hall, M. E. (2018). What justices want. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108621410

Amnesty International. (2023, April 14). Amnesty International report 2022/23: The state of the world’s human rights. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/5670/2023/en/

Koentjaraningrat. (1981). Metode-metode penelitian masyarakat (4th ed.). PT Gramedia.

Muladi. (2002). Demokratisasi, hak asasi manusia, dan reformasi hukum di Indonesia. The Habibie Center.

Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. (2026). America’s courts and the criminal justice system. Cengage Learning, Inc.

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Membedah hukum progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Suhardi, S. (2021). Filsafat budaya: Kriwikan dadi grojogan—Suatu langkah usaha membangun teori hukum komprehensif (Comprehensive Legal Theory). 3M Media Karya.

Supreme Court of the United States. (1966). Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436. Justia Law. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/436/

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812378

Downloads

Published

2025-08-02

How to Cite

Somomoeljono, S., & Tiara Hardy, M. (2025). The Relevance of the Miranda Rule for the Protection of Human Rights in Law Enforcement in Indonesia. The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration, 3(4), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i4.235

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): July-August : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration

Section

Articles

License

Copyright and License Statement

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

The copyright for any article in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license:

  1. The author acknowledges The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0.
  2. Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA)
Licence :
  • The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.