The Ideas of A Comprehensive Legal Theory Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i4.244Keywords:
The Ideas, Comprehensive Legal, Theory ParadigmAbstract
The Comprehensive Legal Theory represents a conceptual approach that seeks to integrate various streams of legal thought normative, empirical, and critical—into a unified analytical framework. This idea stems from the awareness that the dynamics of modern society demand a legal system that is not only based on written norms and regulations but also takes into account social, cultural, economic, political, and substantive justice considerations. The theory incorporates elements of legal positivism, natural law theory, and sociological jurisprudence to form a holistic perspective in understanding, interpreting, and applying the law. This comprehensive approach emphasizes multidisciplinary analysis, the use of normative-empirical legal research methods, and recognition of the legal pluralism that exists in society. Consequently, the Comprehensive Legal Theory offers a responsive framework capable of addressing social change and meeting the challenges posed by globalization, technological advancement, and the complexities of legal relationships in the contemporary era.
Downloads
References
Suhardi Somomoeljono. (2016). Kebijakan Bailout Bank Century dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia. STIH IBLAM Foundation. ISBN 978-602-74366-0-2.
Suhardi Somomoeljono. (2021). Filsafat Budaya Kriwikan Dadi Grojogan: Suatu Langkah Usaha Membangun Teori Hukum Komprehensif (Comprehensive Legal Theory). 3M Media Karya. ISBN 978-623-96109-7-5.
Rahardjo, S. (2005). Hukum progresif: Hukum yang membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif. UNDIP E-Journal System.
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. Harper & Row.
Pound, R. (1912). The scope and purpose of sociological jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review. JSTOR.
Kristiana, Y. (2006). Rekonstruksi birokrasi kejaksaan dengan pendekatan hukum progresif [Doctoral dissertation and related articles]. ResearchHub.
Siregar, M. (2024). Teori hukum progresif dalam konsep negara. OJS Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro.
Siregar, M. Sy. (2024). Articles on legal paradigm development from positivism to constructivism/responsivism. Hukumonline.
Sheehy, B. (2024). Paradigms of legal research: Doctrinal, realist and non-law-focused research. Journal of Law & Public Policy.
Nicolson, D. (2025). Legal education and legal theory. Taylor & Francis Online.
Nguyen, H. T., et al. (2025). LLMs for legal reasoning: A unified framework and future directions. ScienceDirect.
Hutabarat, S. A., Masturi, R., Amalia, M., Puspitaningrum, J., Judijanto, L., Dwiyanti, A., Soemadji, R. T. N., & Kamilah, A. (2024). Dasar ilmu hukum: Teori komprehensif & implementasi hukum di Indonesia. Green Pustaka Indonesia. ISBN 978-623-09-7568-4.
Siregar, M., & Mustafid, M. (2024). Analisis implementasi teori hukum inklusif dalam pembentukan undang-undang yang Pancasilais di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(3), 1299–1314. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v5i3.5951
Susetyo, D. T., & Pradana, A. F. K. (2024). Reintegrasi hukum komprehensif dalam pencegahan kejahatan teknologi di era revolusi informasi. JUNAGARA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.55080/junagara.v1i1.1006
Purwono, U. H. (2024). Rekonstruksi paradigma penyidikan dalam sistem negara hukum Pancasila untuk mewujudkan keadilan berdasarkan Pancasila. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.956
Junaidi, J., Pujiono, P., & Fadzil, R. M. (2024). Legal reform of artificial intelligence’s liability to personal data: Perspectives of progressive legal theory. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(2), 587–612. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i2.3437
Kongres, E., Kogin, K., & Susilawati, C. (2024). The enactment of the common interest concept and the theory of repressive legal protection on consumer reviews against defamation claims. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(3), 973–1000. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.13231
Putra, A. P., Sugianto, S., & Rana, M. (2024). Constitutional theory and practice: Connecting legal philosophy with legal reality. Jurnal Hukum SEHASEN, 10(2), 531–534. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6876
Farida, A. (2024). Teori hukum Pancasila sebagai sintesa konvergensi teori-teori hukum di Indonesia. Perspektif. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v21i1.176
Najmudin, D., Mukhlas, O. S., & Khosyiah, S. (2023). Perkembangan pemikiran tentang transformasi hukum keluarga ke dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhshiyyah, 4(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v4i1.23959
Sukmana, R. A., Kurniati, K., & Sultan, L. (2023). Paradigma keadilan dalam penegakan hukum negara berdasarkan teori kebenaran perspektif filsafat hukum Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Falsafah, 8(2), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.37567/jif.v8i2.1589
Alamsyah, M. S., Shobari, A., Gusma, A., Rahmanda, M. R., Antoni, H., & Dewi, E. K. (2023). Perbandingan tindak pidana tertentu dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 1946 dengan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 ditinjau dengan teori tujuan hukum menurut Gustav Radbruch. Jurnal De Jure Muhammadiyah Cirebon, 7(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.32534/djmc.v7i1.4209
Tomakati, A. A. (2023). Konsepsi teori hukum pidana dalam perkembangan ilmu hukum. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v4i1.99
Marif, M., & Nurhaedah, N. (2024). Teori hukum pembangunan dalam eksistensi mediasi penal di tingkat penuntutan. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 6(2), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v6i2.4529
Y. R. N., Rizqia Aufa H., & Rohima, S. (2024). Sebuah pemikiran teori hukum murni Hans Kelsen. TERAJU, 5(2), 97–108.
Rastiawaty, R., & Alrip, I. (2024). Penegakan hukum terhadap peredaran kosmetik ilegal: Perspektif teori kontrol sosial Travis Hirschi. Jurnal Legislatif, 8(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.20956/jl.v8i1.41596
Yanuar, H. A., Aullia, G., & Helvira, M. S. (2024). Analisis kritis terhadap teori hukum naturalis dalam ilmu hukum kontemporer. Das Sollen, 2(1).
Andini, Y., Tasya, P. J. Y. Y., & Septiany, W. (2024). Tinjauan pengaruh teori positivisme hukum terhadap sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Das Sollen, 2(1).
Fitriani, N. (2024). Pengaruh The Pure Theory of Law dalam perkembangan hukum positivisme di Indonesia. Das Sollen, 2(1).
Putri, A. A., Hamdani, A. M., Perdana, Z. A., Kumbara, R. W., Garozy, H. M., & Utami, T. K. (2024). Analisis teori perundang-undangan: Toetsingrecht dalam tradisi hukum Eropa Kontinental dan Judicial Review dalam tradisi Anglo-Saxon. PAMARENDA, 4(2), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.52423/pamarenda.v4i2.47
Sipayung, B., Hamongpranoto, S., & Arifudin, N. (2024). Aspek teoritik relevansi kajian hukum perundang-undangan. Realism: Law Review, 2(1).
Faizah, F. A. (2021). The role of law in the concept theory of justice to rebuild the nation’s economy after COVID-19. Wacana Hukum, 27(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v27i1.3831
Rismana, D., & Hariyanto, H. (2021). Perspektif teori sistem hukum dalam kebijakan vaksinasi di tengah pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal IUS, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i3.951
Syahyu, Y., & Fitriana, D. (2021). Mencari teori hukum yang bercirikan Indonesia berdasarkan aliran sociological jurisprudence. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i1.587
Iskandar, I., Sudrajat, S. A., Putra, R. F. L., Purnama, H., Ridho, M. R., & Nurafifah, D. (2021). Analisis kritis terhadap teori hukum murni. TERAJU, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.35961/teraju.v7i01.1926
Yulianti, F. A., & Handayani, P. (2021). Integrasi filsafat hukum, teori hukum, dan dogmatik hukum: Studi kasus korupsi e-KTP. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Prianto, W. (2021). Analisis hierarki perundang-undangan berdasarkan teori norma hukum Hans Kelsen dan Hans Nawiasky. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan.
Mustaqim, F. N., Kusuma, D. W., Khairunisa, R. M., Wardani, K. I., Sukirman, R. N. A., & Ulhaq, I. D. (2021). Penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia dari perspektif teori Lawrence. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i2.3595
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and License Statement
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
The copyright for any article in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license:
- The author acknowledges The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0.
- Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA)
- The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.
