Juridical Review Regarding the Accountability of Police Investigators in the Case of Wrongful Arrest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v2i3.147Keywords:
Investigation, Accountability, Error in personaAbstract
The sense of justice and basic rights of Indonesian citizens is a central part that is upheld in recognition and existence. As a state of law, Indonesia views the position of all citizens equally without exception. The position of law is accepted as an ideology that is expected to create justice, security, order, and realize state welfare. The police as a state apparatus carry out the task of carrying out law enforcement, where one of its duties is to investigate a case. Cases of misapprehension that have been rife lately have unfavorable implications in law enforcement. The purpose of this research is to find out the factors and how the form of accountability for the occurrence of the misapprehension. The method of normative juridical approach becomes the method used in research. The results showed that there were several factors that caused police investigators to make false arrests which were essentially related to work professionalism. This is clearly detrimental to victims and also law enforcement that is running. The responsibility of the police investigator in this case if the victim makes pretrial legal remedies, it can be processed to stop the investigation and/or prosecution. But in the event that the victim does not file a legal remedy so that the case then proceeds with the process.
Downloads
References
Anjarwati, N., Lesmana, S. J., & Lestari, T. A. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Tentang Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Jalanan di Kabupate Tangerang. Jurnal Crepido, 05(02), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.5.2.161-173
Aswandi, B., & Roisah, K. (2019). Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 128–145.
Dinda, C. P., Usman, & Munandar, T. I. (2020). Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(2), 82–103.
Effendi, E. (2011). Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Suatu Pengantar. Refika Aditama.
Hakim, L., Paidjo, & Putra, T. M. A. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Korban Salah Tangkap Oleh Kepolisian Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3(1), 35–45.
Harahap, M. Y. (2007). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Ghalia Indonesia.
Lathif, N. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penyidik Polri Dalam Kasus Salah Tangkap. Pakuan Law Review, 4(2), 358–404.
Lesmana, S. J. (2024). Exploring Legal Understanding for Adolescents: Counseling on Adolescent Issues and Rights. IJLRSA: The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration, 2(3), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v2i3.135
Lesmana, S. J., & Latif, I. S. (2023). Law Enforcement in Efforts to Combat Cyber Crime in Indonesia: Building Future Digital Security. IJLRSA: The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration, 1(3), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v1i3.90
Lesmana, S. J., & Latif, I. S. (2024a). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Inleiding Tot De Rechtwetenschap). Berkah Aksara Cipta Karya.
Lesmana, S. J., & Latif, I. S. (2024b). Pengantar Sosiologi: Interaksi Individu Dengan Individu, Individu dan Kelompok, Kelompok Dengan Kelompok. Berkah Aksara Cipta Karya.
Marbun, R., & Ariani, M. (2022). Melacak Mens Rea Dalam Penyebaran Berita Bohong Melalui WhatsApp Group: Mengenal Sekilas Psikolinguistik Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Pidana & Kriminologi, 3(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v3i2.85
Maryani, R., Wahyudhi, D., & Siregar, E. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Yang Salah Tangkap Dalam Proses Penyidikan. PAMPAS : Journal Of Criminal, 3(2), 146–162.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
Moritz, J. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Penyidik Dalam Hal Terjadi Kesalahan Penangkapan. Lex et Societatis, 3(1), 151–159.
Prinst, D. (1998). Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Praktik. Djambatan.
Riskiyono, J. (2015). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan. Aspirasi, 6(6), 159–176.
S, M. I. (2014). Perlindungan Korban: Suatu Perspektif Viktimologi dan Kriminologi. Kencana.
Sadjijono. (2008). Etika Profesi Hukum: Suatu Telaah Filosofis terhadap Konsep dan Implementasi Kode Etik Profesi POLRI. Laksbang Mediatama.
Saputra, D. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menerima Gratifikasi Dengan Sistem Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 12–21.
Sintia, V. (2023). Arti Due Process of Law. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-due-process-of-law-lt64edc30233bb7/
Suharto, & Efendi, J. (2013). Panduan Praktis Bila Anda Menghadapi Perkara Pidana: Mulai Proses Penyelidikan Hingga Persidangan. Prenadamedia Group.
Supriadi. (2006). Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Tim Jendela Hukum. (2021). Memahami asas Due Process of Law. Jendela Hukum. https://jendelahukum.com/memahami-asas-due-process-of-law/
Wahyudi, S., Sukma, D. P., & Priambada, B. S. (2022). Upaya Polisi Dalam Mencegah Terjadinya Salah Tangkap Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Ratu Adil UNSA, 6(2), 1–22.
Wahyuni, W. (2022). Bentuk Ganti Rugi bagi Korban Salah Tangkap. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/bentuk-ganti-rugi-bagi-korban-salah-tangkap-lt630492fea6127/?page=all
Waluyo, B. (2011). Viktimologi: Perlindungan Korban dan Saksi. Sinar Grafika.
Waluyo, B. (2020). Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Windayani, T., & Adipradana, N. (2019). Proporsionalitas Pasal 79 Huruf C Undang-Undang No. 29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktek Kedokteran dan Pasal 360 KUHP Dikaitkan Dengan Unsur Kesalahan Terdakwa. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 4(2), 146–159.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and License Statement
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
The copyright for any article in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license:
- The author acknowledges The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0.
- Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA)
- The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.





