Juridical Review of Dispute Resolution Between Manulife Life Insurance Indonesia vs Derama Laia

(Studi Putusan Nomor 1867K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2022)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i1.199

Keywords:

consumer protection, dispute, dispute resolution, Legal Protection

Abstract

This study aims to review juridically the settlement of consumer protection disputes between PT Asuransi Jiwa Manulife Indonesia and Derama Laia from the perspective of civil law. This case began with a dispute related to the implementation of the insurance agreement regulated in the policy between the two parties. The dispute was then brought before the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) and decided through Supreme Court Decision Number 1867 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2022, which stated that this case was more of a contractual dispute than a violation of consumer protection. Through a normative approach, this study analyzes the conformity of the decision with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and the Civil Code (KUH Perdata). The results of the study show that the dispute resolution should be through civil law because it concerns the fulfillment of the agreement between the two parties, not a matter of consumer protection. This study recommends that disputes related to the performance of contracts should be directed to the Civil Court or Arbitration to avoid jurisdictional confusion and ensure proper settlement in accordance with applicable law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anjarwati, N., Lesmana, S. J., & Lestari, T. A. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Tentang Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Jalanan di Kabupaten Tangerang. Jurnal Crepido, 05(02), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.5.2.161-173

Black, H. C. (1990). Black’s Law Dictionary (p. 1193). West Publishin.

Ferdiyan Ganesha, Firman Freaddy Busroh, Fatria Khairo, Marsudi Utoyo, & Herman Fikri. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Pada Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Studi Kasus Putusan BPSK Kota Lubuklinggau Nomor: 002/P.Arbitrase/Bpsk-Llg/Iv/2021). Lexstricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v1i2.7

Fikri, I., & Hartono, K. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaikan Sengketa Konsumen di Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK). Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Mahasiswa UNISSULA (KIMU) 2, 181–197.

Fitri, & Lesmana, S. J. (2021). Indikasi Predatory Pricing Pada Praktek Flash Sale Pelaku Usaha E-Commerce Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Supremasi Hukum, 17(2), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v17i2.1365

Hamidah. (2024). Penolakan Klaim Asuransi Jiwa yang Dilakukan Penanggung Terhadap Tertanggung pada PT. Asuransi Jiwa Manulife Indonesia. Syariah: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.62017/syariah.v1i2.249

Handayani, F. (2021). Analisis Keputusan Pembayaran Klaim Asuransi Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Pt. Jasa Raharja Putera Cabang Makassar. Universitas Bosowa.

Lesmana, S. J. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Atas Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Terhadap Jabatan Notaris Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 di Kota Tangerang. Supremasi Hukum, 15(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v15i1.244

Lesmana, S. J., & Husna, N. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Sikap Pemerintah Kabupaten Tangerang Dalam Menyikapi Sengketa Lahan. Supremasi Hukum, 16(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v16i2.743

Lesmana, S. J., & Latif, I. S. (2024). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Inleiding Tot De Rechtwetenschap). Berkah Aksara Cipta Karya.

Miftah Hanny Safira, Nasrullah, M. G., & Aulia, Y. F. (2021). Potensi Perkembangan Asuransi Syariah di Indonesia. DJIEB:Diponegoro Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 1(3), 195–207.

Nurbaiti, S. (2023). Hukum Asuransi: Kajian Filosofis Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi. Penamuda Media.

OJK. (2023). Roadmap Pengembangan Perasuransian Indonesia. In Departemen Pengaturan dan Pengembangan IKNB, OJK. www.ojk.go.id.

Putra, F., Yama’asura, I., Sofyan, R., & Arya, F. (2023). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen: Jajanan Tidak Layak Konsumsi Masih Beredar. Batulis Civil Law Review, 4(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1273

Rambe, S. H., & Sekarayu, P. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah Atas Gagal Klaim Asuransi Akibat Ketidaktransparanan Informasi Polis Asuransi. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 5(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4073

Setio Laksono, D. (2023). Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dalam Menangani Sengketa Wanprestasi Antara Konsumen dengan Pelaku Usaha. Unes Law Review, 6(1), 770–781. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.883

Shofie, Y. (2003). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Menurut Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen (UUPK): Teori dan Praktek Penegakan Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sidabalok, J. (2010). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soekanto, S. (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Press.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Suwarsogo, J. Z. A., & Arwanto, B. (2021). Kewenangan Bpsk Dalam Memeriksa dan Mengadili Perkara Asuransi; Studi Kasus Pada Perkara Antara Drs. Khamdani dengan PT Asuransi Bina Dana Arta Tbk. Cabang Banjarmasin dan PT Oto Multiartha Cabang Sampit Tahun 2016. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 8(6), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v8i6.23377

Wagian, D., & Fathoni, M. Y. (2014). The Government Contractual Dispute Resolution Truth International Commercial Arbitration and Its Problems. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(6), 572–587. https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v2i6.192

Wahyuni, W. (2022). Objek Penelitian Hukum Normatif untuk Tugas Akhir. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/objek-penelitian-hukum-normatif-untuk-tugas-akhir-lt63a46376c6f72/

Widiarty, W. S., & Saragih, R. V. (2024). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Publika Global Media.

Zanariyah, S. (2016). Tantangan Hukum Asuransi Indonesia di Era Globalisasi. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v1i1.103

Downloads

Published

2025-02-25

How to Cite

Khoirunnisa, A., Lesmana, S. J., & Ratna Indayatun. (2025). Juridical Review of Dispute Resolution Between Manulife Life Insurance Indonesia vs Derama Laia: (Studi Putusan Nomor 1867K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2022). The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration, 3(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i1.199

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): January-February : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration

Section

Articles

License

Copyright and License Statement

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

The copyright for any article in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license:

  1. The author acknowledges The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0.
  2. Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA)
Licence :
  • The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)