Peter Hitchens’ Views on Political and Media Issues in an Interview with Michael Simmons on Spectator TV
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v4i2.308Keywords:
Peter Hitchens, Views Political, Media Issues, Interview Michael Simmons, Spectator TVAbstract
An exoneration occurs when a person who has been convicted and punished for a crime is later officially declared innocent based on new and credible evidence. In such cases, the original conviction is overturned after the discovery of evidence that demonstrates the individual did not commit the alleged offense. Exonerations may result from various legal processes, including retrials, reinvestigations, and the re-examination of key evidence presented during the original proceedings. One significant factor often identified in wrongful convictions is the presence of false confessions obtained during police interrogations. Psychological research and legal studies have shown that confessions may sometimes be given under coercion, intimidation, or psychological pressure, rather than as voluntary admissions of guilt. These circumstances can lead individuals to confess to crimes they did not commit, thereby contributing to miscarriages of justice. Therefore, the examination of interrogation practices, the reliability of confession evidence, and the application of legal safeguards are essential in preventing wrongful convictions and ensuring fairness in the criminal justice system.
Downloads
References
Brock, T. C., & Green, M. C. (2023). Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (Updated ed.). Sage Publications.
Cheshire police convolution matter https://youtu.be/QHW8GId2ylc?si=Rz0mb55nG2LQCibF
Cooper GS, Meterko V, Gadtaula P. Innocents Who Plead Guilty: An Analysis of Patterns in DNA Exoneration Cases. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 2019;31:234-238. DOI: 10.1525/fsr.2019.31.4-5.234
Cooper GS, Meterko V. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review. Forensic Sci Int. 2019; 219:35 -46.
Cooper, G. C., & Meterko, V. (2023). Cognitive biases in criminal case evaluation. Journal of Criminal Psychology.
Corteen, K. (2023). Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions in contemporary criminal justice systems. Routledge.
Dr Ravi Jayram discrepancy. removed from Trauma unit, experts, board. Dewi Evens I hold him the main culprit of the all, White male domination typical power abusing. Not negligence it is planned and experimental. https://youtu.be/ZP43oeTspe4?si=8VIyypyxPkWsdhs-
Hitchens, P. (2023). What prison taught me. The Spectator.
Hitchens, P. (2023). You should read Simon Raven. The Spectator.
Hitchens, P. (2024). Political commentary on British media and public debate. The Mail on Sunday.
Hitchens, P. (2024, September 14). Why I believe Lucy Letby’s trial was unfair. The Spectator.
Hitchens, P., & Simmons, M. (2024, July 13). Interview: Peter Hitchens on the Lucy Letby case and media debate [Video]. Spectator TV. https://youtu.be/gNB0CaKI3IM
In this video on the Lucy Letby case, I examine fifty important things that everyone needs to know about Lucy Letby. https://youtu.be/ginnFZbFZ74?si=TyGEQ3LSEHHp3weg
John Sweeney and broadcaster Ruth B. British investigative journalist, examine what happens next in the aftermath of the convictions in the Lucy Letby case. With the Thirlwall Inquiry underway, they ask whether the process is built on the presumption of guilt and what that means for the search for truth. https://youtu.be/be_PR01boXU?si=kRqKSIqzkSHFLKvE.
Kassin, S.M., Cardenas, S.A., Meterko, V., & Barksdale, F. (2022). Prosecutorial misconduct: Assessment of perspectives from the bench. Court Review, 58(4), 162-168.
Kathleen Folbig Retrospective interview. Testimony. https://youtu.be/WLaMFs67KAk?si=8c95S8k4D8sM_Kwe .
Leding, J. K. (2023). False memories and persuasion strategies in criminal investigations. Review of General Psychology.
Let me know your thoughts about this documentary and the case more generally, by leaving a comment below!
Mejia R, Cuellar M, Delger D, Eddy B. What does a match mean? A framework for understanding forensic comparisons. Significance. 2019;16: 25-28.
Meterko V. Strengths and Limitations of Forensic Science: What DNA Exonerations Have Taught Us and Where to Go From Here. West Virginia Law Rev. 2016;119:639-649.
Meterko, V. & Cooper, G.C. (2021). Cognitive biases in criminal case evaluation: A review of the research. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37, 101-122
Meterko, V. (2021). Learning across borders: An introduction to the 2021 Innocence Network Conference scholarship panel articles. The Wrongful Conviction Law Review, 2(3), 171-172.https://innocenceproject.org/research-resources/#:~:text=An%20exoneration%20occurs%20when%20a,being%20vacated%20and%20indictment%20dismissed
Meterko, V., Henderson, J. S., & Gadtaula, P. (2023). Just data: Advancing the innocence movement. Criminal Justice Policy Review.
Meterko, V., Henderson, J.S., & Gadtaula, P. (2023). Just Data: Advancing the Innocence Movement. The Wrongful Conviction Law Review, 3(3), 163-165
Morley, S., Taylor, P., & Turner, J. (2024). A companion to crime, harm and victimisation (Revised ed.). Bristol University Press.
Nelson, F., & Hitchens, P. (2025). Spectator TV discussion: The case against Starmer and Labour [Video]. Spectator TV.
Ochoa C, Salazar C. How the Threat of the Trial Penalty Coerces the Innocent to Plead Guilty: A First-Hand Account of an Exoneree. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 2019;31: 299-302. DOI: 10.1525/fsr.2019.31.4-5.299.
Ochoa, C., & Salazar, C. (2023). How the threat of the trial penalty coerces the innocent to plead guilty. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
Open to residents of the UK, ROI, Channel Islands and Isle of Man. 18+only. Entrants must complete and submit the survey before 23:59 on 25/08/24. [Terms and conditions https://youtu.be/e-AWvza_KmE?si=KzejXZX56_dlQAyY
Peter Hitchens, and Michael Simmons. (13 July 2024.) Interview: The Spectator’ editor for The Spectator TV. https://youtu.be/gNB0CaKI3IM?si=cwftPPrkGqcHoIH5
Points privy council https://youtu.be/xWnc6xpefkI?si=X1Nrdqd7mGyYOPhe
Police Cheshire police. https://youtu.be/C0aAYp_vbxc?si=2QFH5x0ljnRl0on6
Share your feedback on The Daily T podcast by taking our survey: https://surveys.contributors.tel.
Strong focus point https://youtu.be/4tsVR1gReys?si=ctWspzeQoxDZjgff
West E, Meterko V. Innocence Project: DNA Exonerations, 1989-2014: Review of Data and Findings from the First 25 Years. Albany Law Rev. 2016;79: 717-794. https://youtu.be/Mgzr7ZQybdg?si=xXtQdgqB5cfwj_EN Lucy interview May 2023. https://youtu.be/OzcpJVi7I7Y?si=_28DjWCXF5NOODQC
West, E., & Meterko, V. (2023). DNA exonerations and lessons for criminal justice reform. Innocence Project Research Review.
Williamson, T., Milne, R., & Savage, S. (2024). International developments in investigative interviewing and interrogation. Routledge.
With the Criminal Cases Review Commission now central to what comes next, could this case return to the Court of Appeal? And if it does, will it mean a retrial, or freedom? https://youtu.be/ginnFZbFZ74?si=TyGEQ3LSEHHp3weg
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fatema Miah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Statement
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
The copyright for any article in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license:
- The author acknowledges The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0.
- Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA)
- The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration (IJLRSA) published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.
