Relevan Mathematics Learning Models In Elementary School In The Era Of Industrial Revolution 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v3i6.173Keywords:
Learning Model, Mathematics, Industrial Revolution 4.0Abstract
This study was conducted to find a relevant learning model in mathematic lessons in Elementary School in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era, which is marked by rapid technological advanced. Mathematic learning as an important foundation in understanding high-level technological concept, integrating technology into the mathematics curriculum addresses inequality of access to digital resources, and engaging students in more interactive and contextual mathematics learning. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with a case study method and literature review. The result of this study are by applying several learning models such as contextual learning models, STEAM and game-based learning models, students can develop critical thinking, problem solving, creative thinking, innovation, communication and collaborating.
Downloads
References
Fitriyani, D., & Kania, N. (2019). Integration of Islamic Values in Mathematics Learning. National Seminar on Education, FKIP UNMA, 346–352.
Budiman, M. (2022). Innovation in Learning in the Digital Era: Strategies and Implementation. Alfabeta, p. 54.
Siregar, E. Y., Holila, A., & Ahmad, M. (2020). The Validity of Contextual Learning Devices for Enhancing Conceptual Understanding. Akademika, 9(02), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.34005/akademika.v9i02.929
Komalasari, K. (2017). Contextual Learning: Concepts and Applications. Journal of Mathematics Education, 23–27.
Nada, L. Q. (2020). Literature Study: Contextual Teaching and Learning to Improve Students’ Mathematical Concept Understanding in the Era of Independent Learning. 2020 Scientific Education Conference, I(1), 145–148.
Surdin. (2018). The Effect of Contextual Teaching and Learning Models on Social Science Learning Outcomes on the Topic of Earth's Formation in Grade VII Junior High School. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(3), 57–64.
Asikin, J., & Jubaedah, S. (2020). The Influence of Contextual Teaching and Learning on Mathematical Concept Understanding. Scientific Papers on Education, 9(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.54438/tulip.v9i1.165
Sanders, M. (2009). STEAM Education. The Technology Teacher, 20–27. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/51616/STEAMmania
Talib, C. A., et al. (2019). STEAM Teaching Strategies in Related Subjects. Education, Sustainability, and Society.
Hunter Doniger, T. (2018). Art Infusion: Ideal Conditions for STEAM Integration. Art Education, 71(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1414534
Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2016). A Place for Art and Design in the STEAM Conversation. Art Education, 3125(June), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519167
Bahrum, S., Wahid, N., & Ibrahim, N. (2017). Integration of STEAM Education in Malaysia: The Why and How. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i6/3027
Rolling, J. H. (2016). Reinventing the STEAM Engine for Art and Design Education. Art Education, 69(4), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176848
Costantino, T. (2018). STEAM by Another Name: Transdisciplinary Practice in Art and Design Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10.632913.2017.1292973
Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design Thinking: A Framework That Breaks Disciplinary Boundaries. In M. Khine & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.007/978-3-030-04003-1-4
Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). Teachers’ Perceptions of STEAM Education Training Programs Across School Levels. Indian Journal of Public Health, 9(December), 2019. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01076.8
Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2016). Constructivism, Design Thinking, and Elementary STEAM Education. Art Education, 69(6), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869
Nicolescu, B. (2018). The Transdisciplinary Evolution of Universities for Sustainable Development. In F. D. Farm, L. Neuhauser, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice, and Education, 73–81. Springer, Cham.
Liao, C. (2016). From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary: An Art-Integrated Approach to STEAM Education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
Katz-Bounincontro, J. (2018). STEAM Focus: Policy, Curriculum, and Programmatic Developments in Art-Based Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1551159
Mali, M. D., & Son, A. L. (2023). Learning Through a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Enhance Problem-Solving Skills in Junior High School Students. IPM: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 1(2), 117–124.
Warohidah, R., Anisah, & Kusuma, B. A. (2019). Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Its Development in Mathematics Learning. Proceedings of Sendika, 5, 5–11.
Sutarno, H. (2018). Learning Environments in Mathematics Education to Foster 4C Skills for Preparing Superior Human Resources in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. National Seminar on Mathematics Education, vol. 1, 33–50.
Lubis, Y., & Ritonga, A. (2023). Implementation of Islamic Religious Education Teacher Preparation in Elementary Schools. At-Tarbiyat: Journal of Islamic Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37758/jat.v6il.632
Almahorseya, M. Z., & Mardiyah, S. (2023). Implications of Vygotsky’s Constructivist Theory in Group Learning Model Application at TK Anak Mandiri Surabaya. Jurnal Buah Hati, 10(2), 1–13.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dinar Pusparini, Na’imah Na’imah, Istiningsih Istiningsih, Sintha Sih Dewanti, Nazliati Nazliati, Selvy Apliyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Statement
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
The copyright for any article in The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license:
- The author acknowledges The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0.
- Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS)
- The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.
