Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Malaysian Schools: A Scoping Review Of Teacher Readiness And Implementation Challenges (2020–2025)

Authors

  • Rosmalily Salleh Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia
  • Vaikunthan Rajaratnam Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Malaysia
  • Shahazwan Mat Yusoff Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya. Malaysia
  • Saedah Siraj Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya. Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v5i4.346

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, AI implementation readiness, teacher professional capacity, ethical governance, scoping review, Malaysia

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping educational systems globally, raising pressing questions about implementation readiness, governance, and professional capacity. In line with the implementation of the Digital Education Policy by the Ministry of Education Malaysia, there is an increasing need to understand AI implementation readiness and the challenges associated with AI integration in schools. This study aims to map and synthesise existing literature on AI implementation readiness and related issues in Malaysian national schools between 2020 and 2025. A scoping review methodology guided by the PRISMA-ScR framework was employed. Literature was sourced from MyJurnal, Google Scholar, and ERIC databases. Thematic analysis identified three dominant themes: high levels of teacher interest accompanied by moderate technical competence, significant infrastructural disparities between urban and rural schools, and the absence of clear ethical guidelines governing AI use in classrooms. The findings indicate that while Malaysian teachers demonstrate positive attitudes towards the potential of AI to enhance learning, systematic support in terms of professional development, infrastructure, and policy remains insufficient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, N. A., & Yusof, M. A. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and perceptions towards artificial intelligence in Malaysian schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.3

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Crompton, H., Jones, K., & Burke, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Teacher readiness and pedagogical implications. Computers & Education, 182, Article 104458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104458

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos,

O. C., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1

Kong, S. C., Cheung, W. M. Y., Zhang, G., & Li, K. Y. (2021). Teacher development in computational thinking and artificial intelligence education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100026

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021). Digital education policy (Dasar Pendidikan Digital). https://www.moe.gov.my

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2020). Scoping reviews. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI manual for evidence synthesis (pp. 406–451). JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

Salleh, R. (2023). Rethinking teaching strategies: Considerations for promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion. The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology, 2(5), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v2i5.70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v2i5.70

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D.,

Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–

https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org DOI: https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350

Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–

https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995

Downloads

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

Rosmalily Salleh, Vaikunthan Rajaratnam, Shahazwan Mat Yusoff, & Saedah Siraj. (2026). Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Malaysian Schools: A Scoping Review Of Teacher Readiness And Implementation Challenges (2020–2025). The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology, 5(4), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v5i4.346