Legal Position of Crown Witnesses as Evidence in Corruption Crime Trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v1i1.140Keywords:
Crown Sanctions, Evidence, CorruptionAbstract
The aim of this research is to find out the position of crown witnesses in the criminal justice process for corruption. And the strength of evidence against crown witnesses in corruption cases. The research method uses descriptive qualitative methods with normative law. Data collection techniques include observation to observe the legal status of crown witnesses. In-depth interviews with key informants to obtain accurate and valid data. Documentation study with a number of data from existing archives as well as notes from the trial. The results of the research show that basically the strength of the evidence of crown witnesses is the same as that of witnesses in general and is in accordance with applicable legal provisions. The strength of the evidence of the crown witness regarding the issue of corruption as valid and convincing evidence as the strength of the evidence of the crown witness has met the applicable requirements.
Downloads
References
Adam, S. (2019). FUNCTION OF EXPERT STATEMENT IN PROOF OF THE CRIME OF MURDER. Belo Journal Volume 4.
Achmad Sulchan, S. (2021). CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN PROCEEDING PRACTICE. Semarang: Unissula Press.
Ainal Hadi. S. H., M. M. (2012). Criminology and Victimology. Banda Aceh : CV. BINA NANGROE. Ali Imron, S. M. (2019). LAW OF EVIDENCE. South Tangerang: UNPAM PRESS.
Ali, M. (2011). Basics of Criminal Law. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Anatomy Noble, C. C. (2010). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REVERSING THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN THE CRIME OF GRATIFICATION. Lex Jurnalica Vol. 7 No. 2 , 11-12.
Asprianti. (2017). THE POSITION OF A DE AUDITU WITNESS IN JUDICIAL PRACTICE ACCORDING TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW. ejournal.unsrat.ac.id
Bahrain. (2017). Determining Suspects According to Criminal Procedure Law from a Human Rights Perspective. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES, 8-10.
Bakhri, S. (2012). Burden of Proof in Several Judicial Practices, p. 16. Jakarta: Gramata Publishing.
Bakhri, S. (2009). Law of Evidence According to Islamic Procedural Law and Positive Law. Yogyakarta: Learning Library. Bangkut, N. S. (2019). JURIDICAL STUDY OF CASE PROCEEDINGS BY THE STATE POLICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA. Lex Et Societatis Vol. VII/No. 2 , 3-6.
Chazawi, A. (2021). Criminal Law Lessons Part 2. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Damanik, Y. G. (2015). WITNESS STATEMENTS DE AUDITU TESTIMONIALS AS EVIDENCE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF RENEWING INDONESIAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW. Yanels%20Garsione%20Damanik , 66-67.
EkaPutra, M. (2017). Fundamentals of Criminal Law 2nd Edition. Medan: USSU PRESS.
Eleanora, F. N. (2016). Proving the Elements of Unlawful Characteristics in the Crime of Bribery. Scientific Journal of Law and Community Dynamics.
Fajar Sudariyanto, H. W. (2021). ANALYSIS OF CASE TITLE IN THE POLICE CRIME INVESTIGATION PROCESS. Syntax Transformation Journal.
Falah, M. F. (2017). Falah, M. F., Tanuwijaya, F., & Samosir, S. S. (2017). Online Gambling: Criminal Study of Decision Number 1033/PID. B/2014/PN. BDG. Law Lantern.
Farid, Z. A. (2007). Criminal Law I. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Ghina Alifah, E. J. (2022). The Position of Visum Et Repertum as Evidence in Criminal Procedure Law for the Crime of Persecution. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies.
Hafid, A. (2015). LEGAL STUDY CONCERNING PLANNING MURDER ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 340 OF THE KUHP. Lex Crimen Vol. IV/No. 4 , 3-4. Halif, E. I. (2021). ELEMENTS OF PLAN IN THE CRIME OF PLANNING MURDER. Judicial Journal, 7-10.
Hamzah, P. D. (2019). Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Harahap, M. Y. (2016). Discussion of Problems and Application of the Criminal Procedure Code. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Harahap, Y. M. (2012). Discussion of Problems and Application of the Criminal Procedure Code, Investigation and Prosecution. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Hiariej, E. O. (2020). Theory & Law of Evidence. Yogyakarta: EIRLANGGA PUBLISHERS.
Ihsani, A. N. (2017). The Urgency of Expanding Pretrial Objects in Corruption Crimes Viewed from the Perspective of Protecting the Human Rights of Suspects. LEGAL STANDING , 4-6.
Irfan Maulana Muharikin, D. P. (2015). THE POSITION OF A CROWN WITNESS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS IN INDONESIA IS BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF NON SELF INCRIMINATION. Malang: MINISTRY OF TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND HIGHER EDUCATION
Irsan, K. (2002). Minutes of Criminal Procedure Law. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Kaligis, O. (2006). Legal Protection of the Human Rights of Suspects, Defendants and Convicts. Bandung: Bandung: Alumni.
Kawengian, T. A. (2016). THE ROLE OF WITNESS TESTING AS A TOOL OF EVIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS ACCORDING TO THE CODE. JUSTITIA JOURNAL, 2-3.
Kuffal. (2008). Application of the Criminal Procedure Code in Legal Practice. Malang: Muhammadiyah University of Malang.
Lapasi, D. (2016). Determining the Suspect Based on Sufficient Preliminary Evidence. LexetSocietatis Journal, Vol.IV/No. 2/Feb/2016
Latif, D. H. (2016). THE ROLE OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE IN GENERAL CRIMINAL ACTIONS ACCORDING TO THE KUHAP. Lex Administratum, Vol. IV/No. 3/Mar.
Leden, M. (2010). Criminal Case Handling Process. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Maghfira Ramadhina, A. F. (2022). Dakam Visum Et Repertum Reveals Premeditated Murder Case. Wahana Pendidikan Scientific Journal.
Moh. Hatta, S. (2018). Integrated Criminal Justice System. Jakarta: Galang Press.
Muhaimin, S. (2020). Legal Research Methods. Mataram: Mataram University Press.
Munir Fuady, S. (2020). Legal Theory of Criminal and Civil Evidence. Bandung: Citra Afitya Bakti.
Munir Fuady, S. (2020). LEGAL THEORY OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PROOF. Bandung: PT CITRA ADITYA BAKTI BANDUNG
Muh. Arief Syahroni, M. A. (2019). REVERSAL OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CORRUPTION CRIMES. Journal of Legal Studies. 2-4.
Mukhlis, S. M. (2018). CRIMINAL LAW. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press.
Mulyadi, L. (2008). Anthology of Criminal Law. Bandung: PT Alumni. Natsir, A. (2013). Law of Evidence in Criminal Cases in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Nazaruddin, H. D. (2017). Protection of Suspects' Human Rights in Police Investigations. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 6-8.
Ni Nyoman Rina Desi Lestari, A. A. (2021). Justice Collaborator in Case Disclosure. Journal of Legal Analogy
Octavian, V. (2011). LEGAL PROTECTION FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS IN CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS UNDER LAW NUMBER 13 OF 2006 CONCERNING PROTECTION OF WITNESSES AND VICTIMS IS LINKED TO THE SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR NUMBER 4 OF 2011. Surya Kencana Dua Journal: Dynamics of Legal and Justice Issues Vol. 8 Number 2 December 2011, 15.
Pangaribuan, A. M. (2017). Introduction to Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. RI Chief of Police Regulation No. 12 of 2009 concerning Supervision and Control of the Handling of Criminal Cases within the National Police. Prodjodikoro, W. (2008). Criminal Procedure Law. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Ramadhan, M. Z. (2021). THE INVESTIGATOR'S OBLIGATION IN SUMMONING AND EXAMINING WITNESSES A DE CHARGE. Banjarmasin: Juenal of Indonesian Law Enforcement. Rampen, D. A. (2018). THE LEGAL STANDING OF THE DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT AS EVIDENCE IN ARTICLE 189 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Lex Et Societatis Vol. VI/No. 2/April , 6. Rangkuti, R. (2019). STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN THE PROCESS. VOLUME 1 , 2-3.
Rochaeti, N. (2021). Judge's Considerations in Using Forensic Medical Expert Statement as Evidence for the Crime of Murder. Journal of Indonesian Legal Development, 15.
Rocky Marbun, S. (2015). The Indonesian Criminal Justice System An Introduction. Malang : SETARA PRESS.
Samosir, C. D. (2013). A Handful About Criminal Procedure Law. Bandung: Setara Press.
Sastrawidjaya, S. (2011). Criminal Law I. Bandung: CV Amico Bandung. Hose, D. J. (2012). THE POSITION OF WITNESS TESTIMONIALS FOR THE SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH. Lex Crimen Vol.I/No.2/Apr-Jun/2012.
Setiawan, P. A. (2021). IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL SANCTIONS AGAINST ONLINE GAMBLING ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL LAW BOOK. (Doctoral dissertation, CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF DE LA SALLE).
Sirait, A. S. (2019). Position and Effectiveness of Justice Collaborators in Procedural Law. El-Qanuny Journal, 2.
Soeparmono. (2016). Expert Statement and Vosum Et Repertum in Aspects of Criminal Procedure Law. Bandung: Bandung: Bandar Maju.
Soetama, H. (2011). Law of Evidence in Criminal Procedure. Bandung: P.T. Bandung Alumni.
Sofian, A. (2018). The Teaching of Causality in Criminal Law. Jakarta: Media Group.
Sudarto. (2010). Law and Criminal Law. Bandung: Bandung Alumni. Sukarna, K. (2014). Guidance Evidence in the Criminal Justice Process. Proceedings of the National Seminar, 8.
Sumaryanto, D. (2019). Reversal of the Burden of Proving Corruption Crimes in the Context of Recovering State Financial Losses. Jakarta: Library Achievement.
Susi, E. (2019). Strength of Evidence of the Defendant's Statement Based on Article 189 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Jakarta: Juenal Lex Crimen Vol.VIII/No. March 3/2019.
Wibowo, D. A. (2011). The Role of Crown Witnesses in Criminal Justice in Indonesia. Jakarta: Journal of the Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia.
Wijaya, F. (2016). RECONSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN DISCLOSURE OF OFFENSES. Widya Journal, 4-5.
Yahya, H. M. (2002). Discussion of Problems and Application of the Criminal Procedure Code: Examination of Court Trials, Appeals, Cassation and Judicial Review. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Yusup Khairun Nisa, J. K. (2015). THE POWER OF VISUM ET REPERTUM AS A TOOL OF EVIDENCE. Varia Justicia Vol 11 No.1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Statement
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
The copyright for any article in The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license:
- The author acknowledges The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0.
- Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS)
- The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.
