Improving Professional Ethics and Academic Integrity in Teaching Virtues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v5i5.369Keywords:
Improving Professional, Ethics, Academic, Integrity, Teaching VirtuesAbstract
Academia virtues are Education (-learning), Understanding, Demonstration, Practice and Knowledge. Education of through the pathways of academia or vocational routes, the knowledge and skills are essential aspects in social development that promote in maintaining the progressive society. The sources of all learning and teaching required to be provided in with valid SMART systematic process of procedure. The technology enables effective learning processes for learners and educators. Integration of Gamifications had been applied with validated procedure of innovation. The concepts of teaching virtues are as well as the phenomenal, the core and a century old: a) the Pedagogy, there are furthermore three (3) additional to contemporary era suit adapted later formations: b) Andragogy, c) Heutagogy, d) Entagogy. The methods principles are compared against similarities, differences, development and adaptation trends in concept methods mechanisms to assess their relevance and effectiveness among the methods frameworks, included in discussions in contemporary Oracy and teaching learning scope in variations.
Downloads
References
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Geography Discipline Network. Graham, I. D., Logan, J.
Exploring Influential Factors in Engineering Students’. Adoption of Mobile-Based Gamified Learning. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/401614753_Exploring_Influential_Factors_in_Engineering_Students’_Adoption_of_Mobile-Based_Gamified_Learning.
I. Montero-Izquierdo, J. S. Jeong, and D. González-Gómez, “A future classroom labwith active and gamified STEAM proposal for mathematics and science disciplines:Analyzing the effects on pre-service teacher’s affective domain,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 16,p. E35911, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35911[2]
A. Khaoula, (PDF) Exploring Influential Factors in Engineering Students’ Adoption of Mobile-Based Gamified Learning. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/401614753_Exploring_Influential_Factors_in_Engineering_Students%27_Adoption_of_Mobile-Based_Gamified_Learning [accessed Apr 02 2026].
Statutory guide. National curriculum in England: history programmes of study. Published in September, (2013).
Alexander Harris. Stephanie Holt. Entagogy: Developing a Systems-Theoretical Framework for Autopoietic Co-Construction Between Learners and AI in Post humanist Education: https://www.ijems.id/index.php/ijems/article/view/215.
SAGE. Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094Cherry, K. (2022). What is motivation? Very well Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-motivation-2795378
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press.
Blaschke LM. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning.
D’Souza R. Res Initiatives. (2024). Understanding heutagogy: a new “gogy”. https://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/jri/vol8/iss4/3/
Derek Gillard. Education in the UK: a history. (First published June, 1998.) (Republished, version, May, 2018). © copyright Derek Gillard 2018: The right of Derek Gillard to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner for the purpose of training artificial intelligence technologies or systems. This work is reserved from text and data mining in accordance with Article 4(3) Directive (EU) 2019/790.
Fatema Miah (author self-ref). Pedagogy: (March 2026). The Core of Education: Implementing Knowledge, Ethics and Professional Boundaries in Teaching Practice. Journal, The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/401369892.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 1970 Fatema Miah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Statement
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
The copyright for any article in The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license:
- The author acknowledges The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0.
- Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS)
- The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology (IJEMS) published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.
