The Role of Teachers as Curriculum Developers through Classroom Action Research in Enhancing Learning Innovation at Fatahillah Senior High School Ciledug

Authors

  • Alini Syakira Putri Sheikh Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang, Indonesia
  • Sutarman Sheikh Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v5i3.335

Keywords:

Teacher Roles, Curriculum Developer, Classroom Action Research (CAR), Learning Innovation, Merdeka Curriculum

Abstract

The role of teachers as curriculum developers has become increasingly important in the implementation of competency-based education and the Merdeka Curriculum. However, teachers’ participation in curriculum development continues to face several challenges, including limited reflective practice, insufficient professional training, and heavy administrative workloads. This study aims to analyse the role of teachers as curriculum developers through Classroom Action Research (CAR) in enhancing learning innovation at SMA Fatahillah Ciledug. The research employed a qualitative approach using a descriptive case study design. Participants included subject teachers, the vice principal for curriculum affairs, and the school principal, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis, while data analysis followed the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that teachers play a significant role as curriculum developers by adapting learning instruments, developing teaching modules, integrating digital media, and implementing innovative learning strategies based on reflective practice. Teachers actively involved in CAR demonstrated greater innovation in applying project-based, collaborative, and contextual learning approaches. CAR also contributed to improving teachers’ professional competence, reflective skills, and involvement in curriculum development. In addition, collaborative CAR supported interdisciplinary learning integration and strengthened the school’s culture of innovation. Nevertheless, the implementation of CAR still faces several obstacles, such as limited time, administrative burdens, and insufficient institutional support. Therefore, schools need to provide more systematic support by strengthening reflective and collaborative cultures alongside continuous professional development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alini Syakira Putri, Sheikh Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang, Indonesia

We hope that this research article can be published in the IJEMS journal.

References

Abrenica, J. V., & Cascolan, M. S. (2022). Classroom action research and teacher innovation in learner-centered instruction. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 17(2), 45–58.

Andriadi, R., & Sulistiyo, U. (2024). School leadership and teacher engagement in curriculum implementation: Evidence from Indonesian secondary schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(1), 77–89.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Damanik, E., Siregar, N., & Simanjuntak, R. (2024). Reflective teaching practices in digital curriculum transformation. Journal of Digital Learning in Education, 6(1), 15–28.

Elliott, J. (2024). Action research for educational change. Open University Press.

Kobiah, J. K. (2020). Teachers as curriculum developers in competency-based education. African Journal of Educational Studies, 12(3), 101–115.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Luo, X., & Muyunda, G. (2021). Teacher participation in curriculum design and implementation: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Curriculum Studies, 9(4), 211–225.

Marcussen, C., Hjardemaal, F., & Shanks, J. (2021). Collaborative action research and interdisciplinary curriculum innovation in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103367.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2021). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 51(2), 203–220.

Sepadi, M., & Molapo, M. R. (2024). Teacher agency and curriculum adaptation in contemporary education systems. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogical Studies, 14(1), 55–70.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Thamrin, H. (2022). Penelitian tindakan kelas dan pengembangan profesionalisme guru di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 120–132.

Voogt, J., Pieters, J., & Handelzalts, A. (2022). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects on professional development and curriculum innovation. Educational Research Review, 35, 100430.

Wildan, M., & Yusuf, A. (2024). Implementation of classroom action research in improving scientific learning approaches. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(1), 88–99.

Zaenab, S., Rahmawati, D., & Hidayat, T. (2024). Kurikulum Merdeka and teacher autonomy in innovative learning practices. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 5(1), 1–14.

Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Chen, X. (2023). Collaborative action research for curriculum reform and teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103870.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Syakira Putri, A., & Sutarman. (2026). The Role of Teachers as Curriculum Developers through Classroom Action Research in Enhancing Learning Innovation at Fatahillah Senior High School Ciledug. The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology, 5(3), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijems.v5i3.335

Most read articles by the same author(s)